wolven7: (Default)
[personal profile] wolven7
Mai Yamane& The SEATBELTS - [Blue]--- Sure. Your "Higher self" is a dragon, elf, faerie, wolf-raven-chimera conglomerate of wires and fluffy rainbow kitties. (Meryn Cadell - [Why Do I Do]). You're everything and every one you want to be, and how you conceive yourself is a large part of how others conceive of you. Play to appearances, and never, never, ever just try to figure out what makes you yourself, without words, or human conceptual understandings. Never try to get to the bottom of it, and understand yourself, on your own level. Because that would be hard.

Yes, you have a "higher self," that's composed of star-stuff, and integrated, and is separate and distinct from you. Oooh, maybe it's even omni-predicate. It keeps things from you, "for your own good," and tells you things as you're ready to hear them. No, it's not you disassosciating, at all. It is in no way a sign that you're not ready for the levels of responsibility that you think you are.

No, your conceptions of "higher" and "lower" aren't hindering your progress, through life. (Hellsing - [R&R with Saint Dracula]). Yes, they're a clear understanding of the way things actually are. Sarcasm? Why would i be sarcastic, with you?

Now shut the fuck up, and get on with it, already. The irony is fucking killing me.

This multi-layered, mostly ironic statement brought to you by the Foundation for People Tired of Hearing People Not Realise How Much They Devalue and Disempower Themselves with New Agey Talk, the HUD Foundation, Troy Systems, and People Like You.

Thesis. Meme.

Date: 2004-12-15 10:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] okkitten.livejournal.com
*sigh* I'm so afraid to know what brought this on. None the less *pets* It'll be okay someday when all the idiots are dead.

Date: 2004-12-15 10:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
To quote my half of the conversation i just had with [livejournal.com profile] fuzzybastard:

"I'm just getting sick of hearing the term "higher self" bandied about, like it doesn't do something to what This Is, then. It's not that i disagree that there are layers, or facets, of this life. In fact, i kind of count on it. It's that calling one set "Higher" necessarily implies that one is Lower, whether you make that explicit, or no. And lower means Less Important. And that's Bullshit."

Date: 2004-12-15 10:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] okkitten.livejournal.com
I see. Well I agree that's bullshit, but what do you expect from people who try to sound educated by quoting crap new age books they got on sale at barnes and noble to look good to a girl nearby?

Date: 2004-12-15 10:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
I wish slapping them, really hard, would do something more than make them bitch more.

Date: 2004-12-15 11:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thenowhere.livejournal.com
You're not slapping hard enough, love.

Date: 2004-12-15 11:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thenowhere.livejournal.com
Also,

I LOVE Mai Yamane and the Seatbelts doing Blue. Oh yes.

Date: 2004-12-15 12:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] renatus.livejournal.com
Oi, I have hated hated hated that 'Higher Self' stuff forever. I started looking into psychology, spirituality, and religion a lot when I was a teenager, of course gravitating a lot to the 'alternative' ones, but everytime I encounted something about 'Higher Self' I prickled. It so sounds like a big archaic holdover from Freudian psychology, and done badly. Then of course the tons of fluffybunnyness inherent in a lot of 'alternative' spiritualities and religions, and the sometimes painful clinging to rituals just turned me off completely.

While I don't look down on people thinking themselves something else, inside, different than their physical reality, I know they're going about it in totally the wrong way, like it seems you think. They're seperating themselves into pieces, rather than being a whole. I stopped seperating myself into pieces, and realized that those 'seperate' bits are facets of a whole. One thing, no one facet better or worse, higher or lower, than any other. And besides, I find it quite amusing to imagine myself as a metaphysical gemstone. X)

Date: 2004-12-15 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] renatus.livejournal.com
Oh yes - still trying to read your thesis, but I'm having a hard time reading anything very intellectual right now. I'm feeling very distractable and flighty lately, but I will get to it even if I have to make myself sit in a corner to do it, so to speak.

Date: 2004-12-15 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bakeneko.livejournal.com
I want to take this journal entry home, cuddle it, feed it milk and cookies, and raise it up big and strong.
This is exactly why I don't talk about spiritual crap with strangers. Many things that a person could mention, by the very nature of mentioning them, makes them seem vain, as if they're trying to point out what makes them specialer than all the other kids on the playground.
And higher and lower. . . if people don't understand the concept of utterly imminent divinity. . . then, well, it makes Shinto miko cry.

But omni-predicate gives me this idea of some sort of universal lack of syntactical subject constraint. . . how very zen, or something :/

Date: 2004-12-15 01:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thenowhere.livejournal.com
Every time I look at your username.... All I can think of are kittens in ovens.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
Can you EVER, REALLY slap "hard enough"?

Date: 2004-12-15 02:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
Yeah, hits me almost as hard as "Rain."

Date: 2004-12-15 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
Your last paragraph says it, exactly. No one facet is the whole, and they are not separate things. Just different points of view.

When i read the description, in "The Kindly Ones," i nearly screamed. I'd been putting it together, in my head, the same way, for a few days before i read it. Seeing it, noted by someone else... Felt good.

Thank you.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
I thank you, muchly, for the effort. I think you'll enjoy it, once you can access it.

Date: 2004-12-15 02:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
It's true. I only talk about that kind of stuff, with people i know. I don't brag, or boast, i just talk about things, to get a more clear view of what's going on. Giving and getting the Heads Up, as it were. I know i'm the biggest baddest thing in the dark, and under the beds, and i think everyone else should know the same about themselves.

As i've said before, Imminence is transcendece. And making Shinto Miko cry is Mean. *nods*

Zen Linguistics... you should teach a class.

Date: 2004-12-15 03:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bakeneko.livejournal.com
;~; it's pronounced bah-keh, and means ghost or phantom, if that helps any.

Or if nothing else, kittens baking other things in ovens is probably better. . .

Date: 2004-12-15 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unknownbinaries.livejournal.com
Mrr...shit like this is why I dislike associating with most people on those levels. Because you just *know* this shit carrying over is why most are so concerned with rank and one-uppance and shite, knowledge *as* power in the wrong ways, and ego inflation.

My take? You ARE. Whatever is there, you ARE and it doesn't matter what fucking level it's on cause That designation schematic is all relative anyway.

Date: 2004-12-15 08:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
Exactly. Thank you, love.

Date: 2006-02-11 07:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
No. There's much more offensive things to be said, than that.

Date: 2006-02-11 02:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
Well, Dogma's Dogma, no matter the accoutriments.
Page generated Mar. 16th, 2026 01:51 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios