Booyah, Hookers! Recount!

[wolven7]

Due to bias in the voting process (there were two slots for Crocodile), and the fact that several hundred people cried Shenanigans on the Flying Shark Versus Flying Crocodile outcome, we get a recount. And that's fine by me. A shark could rip a crocodile in half. Deal with it.

And if you're going to challenge the idea of arguing logistics, think about this: If people aren't going to follow the internal logic of the completely unlikely fight, be it Flying Shark Versus Flying Crocodile, Ninja Versus Pirate, Monkey Versus Robot, or Astronaut Versus Caveman, then we might as well just not have the damned things.

Which reminds me: Cast your votes, now! And defend your choice. The point, in my opinion, isn't the actual outcome of the fight, but the debate which may lead to said outcome. Understanding the pros and cons of each position.

Recount, all the way, baby. Recount. ^_^

{12.17am: http://www.the-breaks.com/word.jpg That one's from comorbid. Awesome.}

Comments

[kmn-rdr-caoimhe.livejournal.com]

Well, I found it on dMusic. But yes. It rocks.

And the only way to argue the better fighter now, after actually seeing them in action, is to determine which one was on the dominant hand, which probably would've made the winner, but then there's still the fact that it's a fight between a flying shark and a flying crocodile. Neither one of these creatures is "supposed to exist," but - lo, and behold - We just watched a week-long battle between the two. *shrugzensmirks*

[wolven.livejournal.com]

*Grins* Yep. So many Factors. Moo hoo ha ha.

[unknownbinaries.livejournal.com]

Best unlikely fight someone brought up to me was X-Men vs. Cenobites. I mean....SHIT.

[wolven.livejournal.com]

That would be fucking Awesome.