It. Was. A. Breast.
Feb. 2nd, 2004 01:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
wolven7Damn Near Every single child in this nation has seen at least two breasts. His or Her Mother's. Janet Jackson's exposure, whether it was intentional, or no, is nothing that shocking, except to this extraordinarily repressed nation. It was kind of humourous, and entertaining, to see the look on her face, and, yes, the initial upset and blowing the whole thing out of proportion was good for some giggles, but you know what? Who cares?
This nation needs, above all else, a more progressive, educational, and open attitude toward sex. A lot of young people do the exact things they do, and get knocked up, because of it, because no one is properly explaining these things, to them. Certain ideas are taboo (certain ones always will be), and, as long as things like sex before marriage, public nudity, &c., are seen as horrid by the overly violent population at large, "rebillious youths" will do them. Flock to them. Search them out.
Fucking think, people. It's simple psychology.
Bah.
This nation needs, above all else, a more progressive, educational, and open attitude toward sex. A lot of young people do the exact things they do, and get knocked up, because of it, because no one is properly explaining these things, to them. Certain ideas are taboo (certain ones always will be), and, as long as things like sex before marriage, public nudity, &c., are seen as horrid by the overly violent population at large, "rebillious youths" will do them. Flock to them. Search them out.
Fucking think, people. It's simple psychology.
Bah.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-02-02 10:41 am (UTC)I suppose it's the whole art/smut thing that confuses me. Someone, somewhere might consider all nudity to be smut, whereas someone else actually understands what the difference is supposed to be. Y'know, in the sense of, say...one man's Venus de Milo might be another man's Paris Hilton sex tape.
But then, judging by most reactions to nudity that I've seen other people have (and that I had when I was younger) I guess it seems a bit sensible.
Re:
Re:
Date: 2004-02-02 12:45 pm (UTC)Hell, putting them all in perspective, both incidents were actually more shocking than the Britney/Madonna/Christina kiss.
Re:
*totally ignoring this topic of conversation cause I hate this debate*
Date: 2004-02-02 02:17 pm (UTC)Tokyo Babylon love :3
Re: *totally ignoring this topic of conversation cause I hate this debate*
Re: *totally ignoring this topic of conversation cause I hate this debate*
Date: 2004-02-02 07:52 pm (UTC)But either way, I dont' think a change in our attitude towards sex is what this nation needs "above all else." I think food for the hungry, shelter for the homeless, better educational systems, scholarships, and crime prevention are all a lot more important than whether or not people want to be puritanical about seeing people's naughty bits. :p
Re: *totally ignoring this topic of conversation cause I hate this debate*
Re: *totally ignoring this topic of conversation cause I hate this debate*
Date: 2004-02-02 08:14 pm (UTC)Both. One causes the twisting of the other, otherwise-possibly-a-good-thing state, so there is neither healthy expression, nor healthy restraint and moderation, but obsession on both ends.
Re: *totally ignoring this topic of conversation cause I hate this debate*
Date: 2004-02-02 05:07 pm (UTC)then...
Date: 2004-02-02 07:24 pm (UTC)Re: then...
Date: 2004-02-03 08:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-02 11:17 am (UTC)-The Devin
Re:
no subject
Date: 2004-02-02 11:48 am (UTC)and then danced around shaking her ass or no-ass, as the case may be...
Re:
Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 10:31 am (UTC)with ketchup
which the Dekalb county school system has determined to count as as "vegetable serving."
Re:
Re:
Date: 2004-02-09 01:05 pm (UTC)circa 2000, Thanksgivingish, at my place behind Horizons. I think that may have been the boobie-butter incident, but i may be off by a few weeks.
Re:
And i thought that the Boobie Butter was not to be discussed, again. Cause the Moo Ate it, later. And that was just gross. Heheheh.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-10 06:15 am (UTC)poor misguided cow-dog...
no subject
Date: 2004-02-02 12:01 pm (UTC)Re:
hmm
Date: 2004-02-02 04:18 pm (UTC)-Elizabeth
Re: hmm
bah. understanding.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-02 08:18 pm (UTC)Not only has every one of us seen at least one pair, every female over a certain age HAS the things, as do lots of guys.
Re:
"As do lots of guys."
.... Yes... Ew.