Why i read the comics i read.
Jan. 28th, 2004 08:50 pmhttp://www.geocities.com/Wellesley/Garden/4240/nippur.html
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~humm/Topics/Lilith/bowls.html
Got those little beauties from the good folks over at Clan Bob.
Good times.
{9.12pm: So i have a problem. And it's a very weird problem. (Holy shit, they just played "Blood, Milk, and Sky," on "Angel.") Anyway, my problem is that there are... very rarely, on televisual programmings, dealing with supernatural Things, the essences of consequences and actions. For instance, end of Buffy, was an Apocalypse. The very thing they had always been trying to prevent, they caused. They "Rend A Veil," and all the potential Slayers, in the world, are now Slayers. There is no planning, here, to tell people what the slayer Is, to display a knowledge of Demons, and the supernatural, as they exist, in that world. This Causes Problems. Certain people get locked up, tested upon, disected, etc, becuase no one has any fucking clue what's going on.
My point is that, if you plan to cause world-sweeping change, that re-establishes paradigms of How Things Are, then you need to have fail-safes in place, to alert the populace. Cushion the Blow.
Please keep that in mind, all you Apocalypse-Bringers, you.
Ta.
{{9.58pm: Glad to see they had things in place, afterward, at least. But really, that's one of those things they should have worked out, first.}}}
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~humm/Topics/Lilith/bowls.html
Got those little beauties from the good folks over at Clan Bob.
Good times.
{9.12pm: So i have a problem. And it's a very weird problem. (Holy shit, they just played "Blood, Milk, and Sky," on "Angel.") Anyway, my problem is that there are... very rarely, on televisual programmings, dealing with supernatural Things, the essences of consequences and actions. For instance, end of Buffy, was an Apocalypse. The very thing they had always been trying to prevent, they caused. They "Rend A Veil," and all the potential Slayers, in the world, are now Slayers. There is no planning, here, to tell people what the slayer Is, to display a knowledge of Demons, and the supernatural, as they exist, in that world. This Causes Problems. Certain people get locked up, tested upon, disected, etc, becuase no one has any fucking clue what's going on.
My point is that, if you plan to cause world-sweeping change, that re-establishes paradigms of How Things Are, then you need to have fail-safes in place, to alert the populace. Cushion the Blow.
Please keep that in mind, all you Apocalypse-Bringers, you.
Ta.
{{9.58pm: Glad to see they had things in place, afterward, at least. But really, that's one of those things they should have worked out, first.}}}
no subject
Date: 2004-01-28 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
no subject
Date: 2004-01-28 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
And they did do an ok job with it, there.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-28 10:06 pm (UTC)And in reference to the end of Buffy- I didn't like it much. I thought it was kind of a cheesy way out of a series, to make all the potentials slayers... I also don't like how they're supposed to be the new watcher's council on Angel. However, that's just me.
no subject
And, yeah, it was a kind of cop out. But i DO like that they took matters into their own hands. If they're smart, they'll never bring them onto "Angel," again. Talk about them, maybe, but not show them. I think that one showing is a clear point made.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-28 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
They Know how bad of an idea it would be to bring Buffy and crew in there, as anything more than a mention; they have too much power, right now, as something for which people may pine. The better tack would be to overcome that need, and grow stronger, for the unrequite. That's simply good story-telling.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-29 06:17 am (UTC)Re:
no subject
Date: 2004-01-29 06:21 am (UTC)Re:
Because that was simply Dropped on people, they flipped out, and there were far-reaching consequences, and other contexts, yes.
But i still say there needs be contingencies.