So. A question:
May. 16th, 2008 10:59 pmWhat do you think when you hear, read, or otherwise encounte the word "Magic[k]"?
Not what you think I mean, or what you think I want to hear.
What do you think? Do you even care about the concept?
Just give a shout out, here, and we'll talk about it.
I'm off for more beer, or acohol, in general
Not what you think I mean, or what you think I want to hear.
What do you think? Do you even care about the concept?
Just give a shout out, here, and we'll talk about it.
I'm off for more beer, or acohol, in general
Twinkly even.
Date: 2008-05-17 04:26 am (UTC)Re: Twinkly even.
Date: 2008-05-17 10:34 pm (UTC)What religious persuasion is your boss, that he rests so adamantly against, and won't listen to the many theologians who clarify that injunctions against witchcraft were against it's use for Evil, not for Good?
And I hope so. Haven't physically seen you in years.
Re: Twinkly even.
Date: 2008-05-20 05:33 am (UTC)Oh, and the bossman is a protestant flavor christian... I'd have more respect if it seemed his religion was a discipline to him, instead it seems more of a social status. Normally I'm more tolerant, but this guy goes out of his way to make me uncomfortable discussing religion. I got tired of trying to offer any new light to his world since he always found a way to make me sorry I tried. Example: Gave him a pumpkin (with a markered-on face) for halloween; immediately was told I was being offensive to him because "witches beheaded victims and laid them around their property and I was mimicking witches if I make Jack O' Lanterns..." See how that can get old? :)
Re: Twinkly even.
Date: 2008-05-22 02:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 04:39 am (UTC)anyway. that out of the way, because i'm working on a thesis, magic is also what other people say it is. my favorite right now is that magic is a form of religion. not something you do in a religion, not something that bolsters your spirituality, but a religion in itself.
i think of fluffy and nonfluffy pagans.
i think of The Prestige and a host of other films.
spells and latin/greek words and potions and components and cauldrons.
i think of the card game.
i think of the security classification during world war two.
i do care about the concept. but personally dont consider myself capable of even slight-of-hand. so, apart from talking about it, i tend to stay out of it.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-19 02:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 05:48 am (UTC)i often think of the labrynth. or something along those lines. or my lovely aunt nadine who has a house dragon. and used to tell me she would turn me into a toad.
;D
no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 10:37 pm (UTC)You ever read 'Books of Magic,' by Neil Gaiman?
And I know a lot of people with similar. Friend of mine used to (and maybe still does) have a car dragon.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 09:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 01:06 am (UTC)I think MORE people would go for it if you could actually have more identifyable results. Like, serious levitation, curing deseases, etc. As is, I think people originally start going for it because it's not widely excepted. Maybe some of this is my Catholic Damage talking, but the absolute rejection of the norm in favor for the extraordinary is something that drew me to it in the first place. Then there can also be the feeling factor. When you work with magic, it feels good, which is one of the only tangible results that you can get a lot of times. I went on an astral travel today and I talked to "X" and we had a good conversation and the whole experience was a very positive one. If that experience was such a positive one, then why not do it again, or something similar. Or even, I got together with friends and we activly made a working to try to make the universe a happier place. 1) for going against the norms. 2) for thinking you can affect the universe in new and interesting ways.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 02:29 am (UTC)Basically, when we focus on it, it put thought and effort into it, it's synchronicity, when there are more than random works, all of which lead to yet another place, then it's not just coincidence. Or something along those lines.
Now. Do you think that IF more people went for it, knowing the kinds of results they could get, if they thought about it in a different way, then it would become easier?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 02:46 am (UTC)InterWorld and my thesis.
Yes?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 06:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-19 06:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-20 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 05:37 pm (UTC)Wonder. Terror. Awe. Power. The judicious application thereof. Hacking reality/yourself to achieve a goal. Art with an effect or a use. Creativity. Soul-fire. Nonlinear causality. How good music or sex makes you feel, that sense of electricity up your spine and your head on fire. Not needing drugs to hallucinate.
Something I'm missing.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 02:53 am (UTC)Depends on the initial action. It could be the being form of magick, as opposed to the verb form, the doing. The raw stuff of it. Ritual without practical purpose is devotion, religion. Energy work without purpose is learning...so which do you mean?
Other criteria?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 04:07 am (UTC)Possibly. They overlap and bleed, too.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-17 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 01:31 am (UTC)Anyway, I'm reading your thesis. I'm about a quarter of the way in I guess. I'll ramble at you about it all when I'm finished with it, and have a better understanding of what you mean when you say magic, occult, etc... so that I'm not throwing words out there, and having symantics ruin the concepts I'm throwing out. I hate when that happens.
Language is a fickle mistress.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 02:01 am (UTC)Can't wait to hear what you think.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-18 05:44 pm (UTC)exercising a knowledge of cause and effect that ... well, this fits into the whole 'suitably advanced technology' bit, no? If you know that every time the cat runs to the West side of the house there's an owl on the East side, and you manage to demonstrate there's an owl on the East side without revealing the source of this knowledge, it may seem like (be?) magic. Hence 'occult' or 'arcane'.
There's also the whole awesome/awful bit. There was something else, but it seems to have disappeared.
The most important one is the proverb, "Magic Takes Time."
no subject
Date: 2008-05-19 02:32 am (UTC)Everything worth having takes some time.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-21 08:04 pm (UTC)There is also a power assigned to the unknown. Witchcraft (their prayers to their god) vs. devotion (our prayers to our god).
This is touching at the edges of my 'blah magic' idea, wherein we're more likely to effect (intentional use) that which we believe, but we're less likely to believe the awesome.
My pants have a huge, inexplicable tear in the back. It'd be awesome if a pair of pants in my size was to show up before I had to go home.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:14 pm (UTC)... of course, I still need more pants. As of now I only have one pair I wear with any regularity.