I dreamed of being in Peru or Panama, somewhere with a dense jungle, with Dr. Cox, and the interns from Scrubs. Doing raids on small enemy complexes, ruins of cities and temples, and we were attacked by a small band of guerrilla witches, where were going to kill us, or trade with us. I traded them my old silver ceremonial knife, for a new one of the same kind. I asked the one with whom I traded if we could touch the blades, together, first, and sheaagreed. She went on to lecture me about how my knife was bound, and being used, and there were Japanese characters hidden in the handle and I knew she was right. Dr. Cox refused to trade, just sitting against the wall, waiting. Someone saw the large spindle of CDs I had in my backpack, broken when they ambushed us, and told me to hide it, if I wanted to keep the CDs.
Next section, discussion of the Peru trip, back in the departments, with Dr. Ruprecht havinga kid, and
scamort being the godfather/uncle, playing with the kid to keep him from crying.
I've been thinking about the fact the philosophy department is shifting away from the ideals that made me interested in philosophy in the first place, that everyone is seeking to privilege scientific explanations, seeking to make them exclusive and inviolate, and I think there are a great number of attendant fallacies, involved in the reasoning for doing so. Not least of which being the naturalistic fallacy attendant in the use of reason to determine our course, and our methods.
Every system eill contain a contradiction. Every. Single. One. Something within the system that, when compared to the rest of the system, seems not to make any damned sense, but is there, and is a fact of observation and reasoning, anyway. That's just the way of it. All I want is for the proponents of various systems to recognise this fact, stop seeking to claim exclusive privilege for their system, and accept that their system is clear and correct insofar as it concerns their experience of the world. Why is that hard?
Bah.
My leg seems to be an effective radio frequency blocker.
Next section, discussion of the Peru trip, back in the departments, with Dr. Ruprecht havinga kid, and
I've been thinking about the fact the philosophy department is shifting away from the ideals that made me interested in philosophy in the first place, that everyone is seeking to privilege scientific explanations, seeking to make them exclusive and inviolate, and I think there are a great number of attendant fallacies, involved in the reasoning for doing so. Not least of which being the naturalistic fallacy attendant in the use of reason to determine our course, and our methods.
Every system eill contain a contradiction. Every. Single. One. Something within the system that, when compared to the rest of the system, seems not to make any damned sense, but is there, and is a fact of observation and reasoning, anyway. That's just the way of it. All I want is for the proponents of various systems to recognise this fact, stop seeking to claim exclusive privilege for their system, and accept that their system is clear and correct insofar as it concerns their experience of the world. Why is that hard?
Bah.
My leg seems to be an effective radio frequency blocker.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 12:17 am (UTC)Thank you, for the thought. More importantly, how have you been?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 12:27 am (UTC)Been kind of a hard week, car troubles, job troubles. Just trying to keep my head above water...
no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 08:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 07:08 pm (UTC)