I don't know if it gets any simpler:
Jun. 23rd, 2007 05:50 pmIf all states of affairs that can possibly exist do, in fact, exist, in potential, then all currently apprehending states of affairs ("the present") are affectd by previously apprehending but no longer real states of affairs ("the past") as well as potentially apprehending but not yet occuring states of affairs ("the future"). They are matricies of potential, interacting in a vast soup thereof.
In this probabilistic expression of reality, any currently apprehending state carries in it the seeds of the "future's" potential, from most to least probable. For that probability to make itself known, via unconscious process of extrapolation, resulting in sound or images that may later come to past is not that different from a memory of "the past" or a dream about a person you know, wherein they do or say something in line with "their character."
What happens now carries with it and is affected by what has happened in the past (merely a previous now) and what may happen in the future (an ass-yet-unrealised Now).
The past decays in probability, the further we get from it, its effects meaning less and less, and more and more, decaying building blocks in a Babel called "History." In much the same way, we already understand that the probability of a "future" event crystalises closer to 0/1, the closer we come to its fruition. Now is the clearest point, and we still see it differently.
Probability soup: everything flavours everything else.
Jeezus.
In this probabilistic expression of reality, any currently apprehending state carries in it the seeds of the "future's" potential, from most to least probable. For that probability to make itself known, via unconscious process of extrapolation, resulting in sound or images that may later come to past is not that different from a memory of "the past" or a dream about a person you know, wherein they do or say something in line with "their character."
What happens now carries with it and is affected by what has happened in the past (merely a previous now) and what may happen in the future (an ass-yet-unrealised Now).
The past decays in probability, the further we get from it, its effects meaning less and less, and more and more, decaying building blocks in a Babel called "History." In much the same way, we already understand that the probability of a "future" event crystalises closer to 0/1, the closer we come to its fruition. Now is the clearest point, and we still see it differently.
Probability soup: everything flavours everything else.
Jeezus.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-24 06:08 am (UTC)You mean all those ridiculous motivational posters weren't full of crap!?
the next thing you'll be tellin me is that J.K. Rowling has single handedly reinvented magic. (which is part of the reason that I refuse to read the H.P. books)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-24 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-24 06:20 am (UTC)I'd like to have my reality modifying powers in the hands of people that have no idea what 'hookin up' is.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-24 06:21 am (UTC)Done for the few.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-24 06:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-24 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 05:28 am (UTC)Shit, even Gaiman didn't reinvent. He just told the really old stuff in really, really good ways. Reminded everyone.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-24 01:57 pm (UTC)It's a fact of classical physics, though, not modern physics. The two are very different!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-26 06:01 am (UTC)