More meme for your money.

[wolven7]

And since you didn't pay for this, that's infinite profit! Anyway, here's this thing that the inspirational jessicamelusine did, yesterday, and I think it was a pretty delicious idea:

Naughty secrets day.

Now, you can feel free to mention what you want, how you want. I'll not even be mad if you post annonymously, this time.

My own secret's right there. Not in very much detail, because that's not the deal, now is it? Not much a secret, anymore, though, is it?

'However please be respectful of what other folks write so as not to make Naughty Secrets Day anything but a sizzly pleasure. Understand? Good.' - jessicamelusine

Enough qualification and waffling; I like sharing.

Comments

[firebirdgrrl.livejournal.com]

I once had glorious, debauched sex behind the counter of a game/ sf bookstore in Cambridge MA after closing time.
I had and used a free packet of bubblegum lube from Pride in my bag (1)
Until the store moved locations, some employees swore you could still catch the scent of bubblegum behind the counter...



(1) I carry a safer sex kit, well, just in case something like this happens.

[wolven.livejournal.com]

Absolutely Wonderful! Only possibly better had it been during hours ;)

a two parter

[raoin.livejournal.com]

secret part one: when ryam was working an Inman Animal Hospital, he used to have to come in on weekends to do pet-saftey-checks and give meds and stuff. i would go in with him and help. as a non-employee i was never supposed to be back there, let alone be administering medications to animals.

secret part two: aside from stealing doughnuts from the back table, we also used that table on at least one occasion for sex. good thing IAH was too cheap to install cameras!

Re: a two parter

[wolven.livejournal.com]

Awesome, and wonderfully efficient.

[cailement.livejournal.com]

Movie theatre seating is often a very good height to have the sex from behind. Just not the stadium seating. Too low to comfortably lean forward across.

[salrushdy.livejournal.com]

I use it in my classes and never really understood math of it,
why ln(x*y)=ln x+ln y, when one apply that to physical units it's crap. (x*y)=unitless(as should be for ln function), but no ln x neither ln y is unitless.

Lessee... what to say.

[raidingparty.livejournal.com]

The idea of porn, sluts, underage sex, orgies, and female subordination turn me on incredibly. The idea, mind you, as it just doesn't work in real life for any number of reasons. I've had random sex offered me and turned it down. I've also accepted, but only with people with whom I had already started developing a trusting relationship. ... which is sort of a defensive stance/explanation for a true naughty secret. But some people would find the first sentence horrifying, so there you go.

Even when I know it wouldn't work, I still wonder about getting back together with my exes. Pride and all that. Yes, all of them, even the horrible-problems ones. All the way back to high school, although that's far less strong because she's been out of my life for so long that I rarely ever think about her, and know almost nothing about her at this point, and there's far less material about which I could construct a reunion fantasy.

If you are a female I find attractive and I have seen you (or a picture of you), I have probably imagined having sex with you. Possibly even kinkily. The likelihood (for both statements) only increases with each contact.

I can be fairly shallow in regards to "finding attractive" (as some who have known the aforementioned exes could attest). I'm very forgiving about some things and not about others.

Probably more than some of you wanted to know, but there it is.

Re: Lessee... what to say.

[wolven.livejournal.com]

I think that's more true of a number of people than they would like to admit; that's the nature of pornography, in the modern age. As Grisham said min Transmet, issue 27, "If it ain't kind of creepy and dirty and mysterious and forbidden, guys don't get off." Which is unfortunately true, at the moment.


But the inhibitions should go, eventually, so we can get to the root of our kinks. Then most people wouldn't have to be freaked out by the fact that they like it.

Re(2): Lessee... what to say.

[raidingparty.livejournal.com]

Guys get off, but there's a different bent. The arousal from heavy petting is different from the arousal of imagining having a french maid around the house offering to polish things. Heh.

Now that I think about it, the common theme for the first admission (and probably the referenced porn) is the objectification. There's a kink to objectification that's exciting and unhealthy. Or might be healthy if explored in the liminal space. But on the whole, I like the people around me to be people. I'm not sure why a different part of my brain wants differently.

Not negatively affecting my life as best I can tell, though. Unless this LJ shows up during my next interview. Whoo boy...

Reminded of one of childofmetis' recent journal entries, though, about how having an interest in sex and possibly even having had nude pictures should have no effect on the professional consideration of one's capabilities. There's a question, I think, of changing who's in power.

And I'm rambling again. I seem to be good at that, too...