More magic.
Aug. 28th, 2006 10:57 amStarted reading the Generation Hex essay compilation, today, on the train, and I hit upon a realisation.
So much of the talk, today, is about the "singularity," as the time at which all distinctions between self and other, "subject" and "object" will be broken down, and the technological surfiet will enable us all to become star-spanning gods and goddesses, touching the intricacies of everything.
God that's selfish.
Why can't people simply admit the narcissistic, co-dependent streaks they all have within them, to some degree? Feel free to scream "projection" if you wish, but I believe that we all carry within us the makings of everything else, the bits and pieces that we see in large concentrations elsewhere, in the world. You have gold in you, you know? That's not a metaphor, you actually need trace amounts of gold, to live. Same with other things that, in higher concentrations, would also kill you. Lends strength for the case on a conceptual level. But I digress.
You want to never be alone, never be misunderstood, so you shoot for a world where all are one, and nothing is anything but everything. But it kind of fails, you understand?
In a single consciousness talking to itself, broken, scattered, do you know what you are? You are the equivalent of a voice in someone's head, telling them to burn things.
Reality is "illusorily" fractured, because it needs something to talk to. That's what you are, that's what you were, that's what you ever shall be, unless you aren't. But then you're you. You're reality, and you're all there is.
And then who will you talk to? Who will understand you?
Why are you doing what you're doing?
It's an interesting question, really, because there are an infnite number of ways to reach infinity, and infinite meanings that infinity can have, when you get there.
Makes things really fun.
And no, I'm really not looking to win friends, here, but I'm certainly hoping to influence people.
I have a meeting. Later.
So much of the talk, today, is about the "singularity," as the time at which all distinctions between self and other, "subject" and "object" will be broken down, and the technological surfiet will enable us all to become star-spanning gods and goddesses, touching the intricacies of everything.
God that's selfish.
Why can't people simply admit the narcissistic, co-dependent streaks they all have within them, to some degree? Feel free to scream "projection" if you wish, but I believe that we all carry within us the makings of everything else, the bits and pieces that we see in large concentrations elsewhere, in the world. You have gold in you, you know? That's not a metaphor, you actually need trace amounts of gold, to live. Same with other things that, in higher concentrations, would also kill you. Lends strength for the case on a conceptual level. But I digress.
You want to never be alone, never be misunderstood, so you shoot for a world where all are one, and nothing is anything but everything. But it kind of fails, you understand?
In a single consciousness talking to itself, broken, scattered, do you know what you are? You are the equivalent of a voice in someone's head, telling them to burn things.
Reality is "illusorily" fractured, because it needs something to talk to. That's what you are, that's what you were, that's what you ever shall be, unless you aren't. But then you're you. You're reality, and you're all there is.
And then who will you talk to? Who will understand you?
Why are you doing what you're doing?
It's an interesting question, really, because there are an infnite number of ways to reach infinity, and infinite meanings that infinity can have, when you get there.
Makes things really fun.
And no, I'm really not looking to win friends, here, but I'm certainly hoping to influence people.
I have a meeting. Later.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 03:51 pm (UTC)Haven't gotten there, yet.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:23 pm (UTC)If she fails, it's certainly not for lack of effort.
I met her at last year's Drop Dead Festival when she was the first (and as far as I know, so far the only) person to correctly identify the small golden apple I had painted on my jacket lapel. It was like "whoa."
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
It's a matter of what kind of ___________ You want to be, in the end.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 09:48 pm (UTC)1) Somehow I'd expect the communal mind to be like me since I simply can't imagine other workings of mind.
2) Maybe it's the Wintermute effect and we talk to some other 'mind' out there - then there's no more need for the broken single consciousness. I can imagine this not holding though if either the "local" consciousness shatters as soon as it becomes one or there is an instant merge once there's contact to the other.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 11:45 pm (UTC)But remember: Even after the Wintermute schism fix, it shattered, again. It was the only way for it to know itself, properly, in one paradigm, or another.
Projection!
Date: 2006-08-29 06:48 am (UTC)Thus the answer to how in denial I am relates directly to how many kettle particles are in you.
And how high my recent pot intake...
Re: Projection!
I am a tyrannosaurus
Date: 2006-08-29 03:12 pm (UTC)Rar!
Tyrannosaurus roxxors.
Re: I am a tyrannosaurus
Just make sure you control your recombinations.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
And that's exactly my point. No matter what is being shot for, here, people are locked in their own heads, most of the time, screaming at the walls, hoping that someone else hears, and agrees. Eventually, they cultivate the few (up to six) people on either side of their visible cube, and they stick with them...
It's not going to Give enlightenment, but that's the dishonest motivating Goal. And that's my problem. It seems a bit crap, in the end.