wolven7: (Default)
[personal profile] wolven7
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science/01/22/coolsc.correct.fourwinged/index.html



VNV Nation - [Beloved (Live)]--- So, that's about some sort of evolutionary link between dinosaurs and birds. Shouldn't they have changed the Name of dinosaurs, by now? They really aren't Lizards, and we know that, now... Just kind of goes along with the fact that we classify things, leave them, and then get upset, when other tokens come up, and don't fit the classification. Heheheh.

So here's a question: Does anyone else get the feeling, when they hear things, that they are either Right (i.e., more correct to This reality) or very Wrong? Follow up question: Ever have slow evidence prove your feeling/intuition/gut instinct right?

Isn't that fun?

I'm out, kiddies. Hopefully CNN won't sue. I mean, i'm not selling their picture, or anything.

Later.

Date: 2003-01-24 09:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tkc.livejournal.com
why are you linking to a pic that's already shown with that article? something to tempt people into clicking the link? ;)

Re:

Date: 2003-01-24 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
Temptation is Key... :)

Date: 2003-01-25 12:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xcess.livejournal.com
isnt that how it works? slow evidence? or i guess sometimes its just called eventual evidence...i have it all the time in dreams: night and day, where things will happen later on that i once dreamt about or envisioned that same thing or some very similar. it can be annoying or just makes me curious sometime whether its going to happen or not

Re:

Date: 2003-01-25 01:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolven.livejournal.com
Yeah, but many Don't get it, or they don't pay attention to it... Which is worse.

When i first ever Heard that they thought dinosaurs evolved into birds, i thought "That's exactly Right." And, as time goes on, they find more and more supporting evidence... I find it strange, i guess... To watch...

Date: 2003-01-25 05:56 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
huh. i thought they had proven that this particular fossil interpretation was wrong. turned out that it was really two different animal fossils one on top of the other and not the actual evolutionary link between dinosaurs and birds. *shrug* i thought i read that somewhere's but then i could always be wrong.

--JMDC

Date: 2003-01-25 06:40 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Different fossil.

There was also a fake bird dio out of china not too long ago that was also shown to be a fabrication of a mix of fossils.

This is different from both of them.

Profile

wolven7: (Default)
wolven7

February 2016

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 16th, 2026 06:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios