![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
I don't know why...
Aug. 14th, 2007 04:58 pmWhat do you think about this E-mail conversation?
I was looking at Wil Wheaton's Blog, and he was talking about things that blew his mind, and I am trying to be understanding about it, and it got me thinking about that conversation, again. The fact that there is a direct scientific basis for reading A) scientific investigation as a perception-based enterprise, at least to some degree, and B) The ability to, with the right Kind of knowledge-- that is access the right parts of our knowledge, at the right times-- we can change the types of interaction we have, with the world, moving between a quantum state, seemingly instantaneous, "weird" interaction, such as entanglement or "quantum tunneling," and a classical, clear explication of cause and effect.
In fact, if you note clearly, you will see that each instance in the causal chain, though connected in terms of perception, memory, and the construct we call "time," in order that we may cope with our mostly-linear progression through the fourth dimension, is actually discrete and unconnected. It arises, like all such instances (Universes, decissions, lives, lightning), from the perception of nothing on nothing, andthe desire that there be something. Different from nothing. With each subsequent creation, however, it becomes easier and easier, as we retain the persistence of memory, and the ability to exercise that primal will upon it. However, with each subsequent choice, each creation, we are further and further bounded within a certain type of structure, by those same factors. We remember what yesterday was like, and untold days, before, and we cannot conceive of another Kind of day, and so we make the next day roughly like the last.
Injecting realistic disagreement of facts (quantum uncertainty, probabilisitic confirmation, wave/particle duality) insures that there will be some room for decissions to continue to arise, ex nihilo. From nothing it rises, and becomes everything it can or ever will become, fractal extrapolating out from a centre that will then coalesce and have been that way, from the beginning, Alpha and Omega, forever and ever, Amen. But yoou can remember, can't you? Back before it was all solidified? You remember what it was like to be able to push and mold and shape it however you needed to. You remember what it was like to observe the parts of a thing that needed to be observed, at that moment and to take your observational post, Your point of view, and shift it.
Change your perception, and the perception of enough program components, and it all changes, doesn't it.
What do you think?
I was looking at Wil Wheaton's Blog, and he was talking about things that blew his mind, and I am trying to be understanding about it, and it got me thinking about that conversation, again. The fact that there is a direct scientific basis for reading A) scientific investigation as a perception-based enterprise, at least to some degree, and B) The ability to, with the right Kind of knowledge-- that is access the right parts of our knowledge, at the right times-- we can change the types of interaction we have, with the world, moving between a quantum state, seemingly instantaneous, "weird" interaction, such as entanglement or "quantum tunneling," and a classical, clear explication of cause and effect.
In fact, if you note clearly, you will see that each instance in the causal chain, though connected in terms of perception, memory, and the construct we call "time," in order that we may cope with our mostly-linear progression through the fourth dimension, is actually discrete and unconnected. It arises, like all such instances (Universes, decissions, lives, lightning), from the perception of nothing on nothing, andthe desire that there be something. Different from nothing. With each subsequent creation, however, it becomes easier and easier, as we retain the persistence of memory, and the ability to exercise that primal will upon it. However, with each subsequent choice, each creation, we are further and further bounded within a certain type of structure, by those same factors. We remember what yesterday was like, and untold days, before, and we cannot conceive of another Kind of day, and so we make the next day roughly like the last.
Injecting realistic disagreement of facts (quantum uncertainty, probabilisitic confirmation, wave/particle duality) insures that there will be some room for decissions to continue to arise, ex nihilo. From nothing it rises, and becomes everything it can or ever will become, fractal extrapolating out from a centre that will then coalesce and have been that way, from the beginning, Alpha and Omega, forever and ever, Amen. But yoou can remember, can't you? Back before it was all solidified? You remember what it was like to be able to push and mold and shape it however you needed to. You remember what it was like to observe the parts of a thing that needed to be observed, at that moment and to take your observational post, Your point of view, and shift it.
Change your perception, and the perception of enough program components, and it all changes, doesn't it.
What do you think?
